[Skip to Content]

Defense Says it May Close Some Facilities if Congress Doesn’t Approve Proposal for More Base Closings

The Washington Post - March 8, 2012, By Steve Vogel

Defense Department officials warned a House panel Thursday that if Congress does not approve the Obama administration’s proposal for two new rounds of base closings, the Pentagon will use existing authority to close some facilities.

“Strategic and fiscal imperatives leave the department no alternative — we must close and realign military bases here in the United States,” Dorothy Robyn, deputy undersecretary of defense for installations and environment, told the House Armed Services readiness subcommittee at a hearing on the request for more Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) rounds.

“If Congress does not authorize additional BRAC rounds .?.?. the department will be forced to use its existing authorities to begin to support our new defense strategy,” Robyn said.

She said that the Defense Department has more than 300,000 buildings and 2.2 billion square feet of space, which is “more than Wal-Mart.”

“We are focused on getting rid of capacity we don’t need so we can use the resources elsewhere,” Robyn said.

The proposal came under sharp bipartisan attack from panel members who criticized the administration for making the plan without providing any estimates of cost savings or other details.

“We need a lot more facts before we pass on another round of BRAC,” said Rep. J. Randy Forbes (R-Va.), chairman of the readiness subcommittee.

“I’m as concerned as other members in not knowing the cost,” said Rep. Silvestre Reyes (D-Tex.). “We’re moving in the dark with a request for two BRACs.”

Some members also argued that making further cuts ignored looming threats to U.S. security, in particular with U.S. troops still in Afghanistan and as the United States and other world powers press Iran over alleged research into nuclear weapons.

The Obama administration is “losing sight of the fact we’re still at war,” Rep. Mike D. Rogers (R-Ala.) said. “We could be in Iran in a heartbeat.”

Robyn said that the Pentagon has only begun “initial preparatory work” for a new BRAC, including making inventories of property and examining whether analytical tools for evaluating which facilities to close need to be updated.

“If we do get authorization for 2013, we can move out smartly,” she added.

Robyn said the administration is requesting two rounds because of uncertainty over how deep defense budget cuts will be. “A second round would give us a chance to adapt to things that happen subsequently,” she said.

Robyn warned that if the Pentagon is forced to make cuts outside of the BRAC process, it would be “severely constrained in what it can do to help local communities.” Unlike under BRAC, communities would have no role in determining the fate of property and would have to pay fair-market value for the land, she said.

“Communities would have to fend for themselves to a much larger degree,” Robyn said.

Many in Congress are still licking their wounds from the 2005 BRAC, the largest and costliest round ever, which resulted in 190 closures and realignments.

A Defense Department budget report submitted to Congress last month showed that the total one-time cost for implementing the last round of BRAC was $35.1 billion. This cost was about 67 percent higher than the $21 billion that had been estimated by the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission in September 2005.

Robyn acknowledged that the 2005 BRAC round will not break even until 2018. But she said that the last BRAC round “is not the right comparison” to the proposed new rounds because it “was not about savings.”

The argument was supported by a Government Accountability Office report issued Thursday, which found that the results of the 2005 BRAC were heavily influenced by then-Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld’s goals of transforming the military and fostering cohesiveness among the military services.


To view this article at the source publication, go to http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/defense-says-it-may-close-some-facilities-if-congress-doesnt-approve-proposal-for-more-base-closings/2012/03/08/gIQAuWz0zR_story.html?hpid=z11.

The information above is for general awareness only and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Office of Economic Adjustment or the Department of Defense as a whole.

In the News

  • With or without BRAC, DoD’s footprint is shrinking

    April 8, 2015 – Federal News Radio, By Jared Serbu In each of the past four years, the Pentagon has proposed a new round of base closures and Congress has rejected every one so far. But with or without lawmakers’ approval, the military’s footprint is shrinking. The Defense Department has hinted...


  • Not Your Grandfather’s Factories

    Governing (Voices of the Governing Institute), By Anne Kim – April 8, 2015 It’s not easy for manufacturing to attract the younger, skilled workers that it needs. We need to focus on both the educational pipeline and public perceptions. For much of the past 30 years, the American public’s view of...


  • Improving Public Services: The Secrets of Award-Winning Cities

    April 6, 2015 – Governing, By John M. Kamensky Local governments, their citizens and community interest groups all want better service delivery, and more than ever are looking to technology to make that happen. But technology alone won’t work. What cities that have been recognized for innovations...


  • Looming Army cuts fill Texas leaders with dread

    April 4, 2015 – San Antonio Express-News, By Sig Christenson Automatic federal spending cuts over the last three years have hurt several Texas cities with large military installations — part of the budget sequester that will reduce the size of the Army by 80,000...


  • IMCOM leaders set sights on 2025

    April 2, 2015 – Hawai’i Army Weekly (Army News Service) SAN ANTONIO — U.S. Army Installation Management Command top leaders held a conference, here, for garrison commanders and command sergeants major to set a collective course for IMCOM 2025 and Beyond.


  • Budgets Signal Sequester Cuts Here to Stay

    March 30, 2015 – Defense News, By John T. Bennett WASHINGTON — What to do about sequestration is one issue House and Senate negotiators can skip as they craft a compromise 2016 federal budget blueprint. That’s because spending resolutions approved last week by the House and Senate both leave the...