[Skip to Content]
  • CLICK HERE FOR AN IMPORTANT NOTICE AFFECTING OEA GRANT PAYMENTS AND AWARDS FROM APRIL 20 THROUGH MAY 4, 2015
Hampton, VA

Historically, military installations were located in remote areas, due largely to the availability of land and for security purposes. Over time, however, installations drew both people and businesses closer to take advantage of civilian job opportunities offered by the installation and to provide the goods and services to support the installation’s operations. The increased number of people and businesses, in some cases, has impacted the military’s ability to effectively train and accomplish the military mission.

Through the Compatible Use Program, OEA works collaboratively with communities as well as the Air Force, Army, Navy, and Marine Corps to protect the military’s mission nationwide by identifying existing or potential future land use conflicts and/or incompatible development.

OEA provides technical and financial assistance to communities to conduct a Joint Land Use Study (JLUS), normally a one-year, cooperative land-use planning effort between a local government and a military installation. The study presents recommendations for the community to adopt in an effort to promote compatible development and to protect public health, safety, and welfare while ensuring the mission of the installation is upheld.

The JLUS effort can directly benefit both the jurisdiction and the installation by:

  • Protecting the health and safety of residents living or working near military installations
  • Preserving long-term land use compatibility between the installation and the surrounding community
  • Promoting comprehensive community planning
  • Encouraging a cooperative spirit between the local base command and local community officials
  • Integrating the local jurisdiction’s comprehensive plans with the installation’s plans

The recommendations resulting from this study help local governments, land owners, businesses and others ensure compatible development and minimal impact to the military’s mission. These recommendations can be regulatory (zoning and structural height restrictions) or voluntary (land exchanges and sales). Some examples include establishment of military overlay districts with specific land use and zoning requirements, unified development ordinances, amendments to capital improvement plan, transfer of development rights, building code sound attenuation measures, real estate disclosures, lighting ordinances, and local development review procedures to ensure input from the military.

JLUS Project Process

When a Military Service believes civilian growth and development may impair the military mission, the Service may nominate the installation as a JLUS candidate.

OEA project managers will visit the installation and meet with the local base command and local government officials. OEA will evaluate existing or potential compatible use issues as well as local development controls to determine if a JLUS is justified. If there is interest from both the base commander and the local jurisdiction, OEA may provide a Community Planning Assistance grant to the community to conduct the JLUS.

A JLUS is usually completed in 12 months, although more or less time may be required based on community consensus and outside factors.

OEA Experience with JLUS

To date, state or local jurisdictions have completed 93 JLUS projects, and more than 70 are currently underway. Regardless of size and scope, OEA project managers have worked directly with military installations and communities to ensure that the safety of the community and the mission of the military base remain intact.

For further information, see Joint Land Use Study Program Guidance Manual or The Practical Guide to Compatible Civilian Development Near Military Installations.

To learn more information about the JLUS Program, watch our video The Base Next Door.

In the News

  • With or without BRAC, DoD’s footprint is shrinking

    April 8, 2015 – Federal News Radio, By Jared Serbu In each of the past four years, the Pentagon has proposed a new round of base closures and Congress has rejected every one so far. But with or without lawmakers’ approval, the military’s footprint is shrinking. The Defense Department has hinted...

    Read More...

  • Not Your Grandfather’s Factories

    Governing (Voices of the Governing Institute), By Anne Kim – April 8, 2015 It’s not easy for manufacturing to attract the younger, skilled workers that it needs. We need to focus on both the educational pipeline and public perceptions. For much of the past 30 years, the American public’s view of...

    Read More...

  • Improving Public Services: The Secrets of Award-Winning Cities

    April 6, 2015 – Governing, By John M. Kamensky Local governments, their citizens and community interest groups all want better service delivery, and more than ever are looking to technology to make that happen. But technology alone won’t work. What cities that have been recognized for innovations...

    Read More...

  • Looming Army cuts fill Texas leaders with dread

    April 4, 2015 – San Antonio Express-News, By Sig Christenson Automatic federal spending cuts over the last three years have hurt several Texas cities with large military installations — part of the budget sequester that will reduce the size of the Army by 80,000...

    Read More...

  • IMCOM leaders set sights on 2025

    April 2, 2015 – Hawai’i Army Weekly (Army News Service) SAN ANTONIO — U.S. Army Installation Management Command top leaders held a conference, here, for garrison commanders and command sergeants major to set a collective course for IMCOM 2025 and Beyond.

    Read More...

  • Budgets Signal Sequester Cuts Here to Stay

    March 30, 2015 – Defense News, By John T. Bennett WASHINGTON — What to do about sequestration is one issue House and Senate negotiators can skip as they craft a compromise 2016 federal budget blueprint. That’s because spending resolutions approved last week by the House and Senate both leave the...

    Read More...